We left it late, but a richly deserved
three points. Thoughts as follows:
* There was a degree of consternation when
the line-ups were announced, but it’s hard to know who else Arsene could’ve
played. Gervinho was apparently injured, and Ramsey could hardly start after
the vitriol he received last week. It was the same XI which started (and won)
the game against Spurs, and I think, yet again, Arsene got his team and tactics
correct.
* We started the game well, piled on the
pressure, and dominated possession. But we didn’t score. Indeed, we didn’t even
really create that many chances. While I doubt Man City wanted to concede so
much possession, time and space to us, we didn’t really do a lot with it in the
first-half. In particular, our penchant for throwing useless crosses into the
box was infuriating. We could have done with a little more guile in general
when it came to our final ball – if we’d had that, we could have taken the lead
much, much earlier.
* When RvP headed the ball towards goal, beat
the keeper, and yet was blocked by the head of Thomas Vermaelen, I thought it
was going to be one of those days. That impression was only hardened by Robin
heading the ball against the post in the second half, and the frankly
ridiculous chain of events that saw Walcott have a shot saved, TV mis-kick when
faced with an open goal, and then Benayoun dribble the ball onto the post. On
another day, all three of those would have easily gone in, and we would have
gotten the scoreline we deserved.
* Another reason why we should have won by a
larger margin is that we should have been playing against ten men from about
the tenth minute. Balotelli’s studs up challenge on Song was a straight red. In
any case, I simply don’t understand why Balotelli was playing. Despite his two
goals, he lost the plot last week against Sunderland, and seemed hell-bent on
self-destruction in this match from virtually the first minute. Basically, City
carried a dangerous passenger for 80 or so minutes. Absurd management from a
manager who increasingly appears out of his depth.
* One of the reasons why Balotelli was such a
passenger was the monster performances of both Vermaelen and Koscielny.
Koscielny may well be my new favourite player. He is pure business when it
comes to defending. No histrionics – just gets the job done. After his QPR
nightmare last week, it was also good to see TV have a much better game, even
if he will be kicking himself for preventing and missing two golden Arsenal
chances.
* Nasri – who cares? I mean, really, who fucking cares? In
his three years at the club, he had about six months worth of top-level
performances. For the rest of the time, he was an average passenger. I couldn’t
understand why Mancini thought that Nasri would be so critical to City’s title
challenge, and, indeed, he hasn’t been. As far as I’m concerned we got rid of
an overrated player for a ton of cash. If anything, we should thank him for
being such a greedy bastard.
* Mikel Arteta – not just our best signing of
the season, but surely one of the
shrewdest transfers to take place in Europe last summer. He has been Mr
Consistency, worked hard, and kept us ticking over. The antithesis of Nasri,
but also, in many respects, a better option than Fabregas, who dominated too
much of our playmaking by the end of his time at the club. Arteta has had a
superb season, and won over doubters, like myself, that he would only be a
mediocre replacement for Cesc. His goal today was brilliant.
* I thought another of our signings also did
well when he came on – Santos. With City seemingly, and bizarrely, intent on
staying in their own half for the last thirty minutes, we could afford to bring
on Santos, who showed some lovely touches and movement during his time on the
pitch. I’m really glad we have him. His ‘shoosh’ sign to Balotelli was pure
gold.
* I know this is a subject that has been
raised many times, but what the hell is Stuart Robson’s problem? Is he not, technically,
an Arsenal employee? The vitriol that spewed forth from his mouth about almost
every Arsenal player, and even fans at several points, was incredible, frankly.
I wish Fox Soccer would give us a bit more Gary Neville, because he has been
excellent and impartial every time I’ve heard him.
* This season has been an interesting example
of how money doesn’t inherently buy success in football. Liverpool are
trundling away in mid-table after blowing almost £100 million on the likes of
Carroll, Downing, Adam and Henderson (just think about that for a moment); Man
City have just blown the title after spending ridiculous sums on only slightly
better players (is Dzeko really that much better than Carroll, for example?).
Performing well in the league is a long, arduous task, and you need to build a
squad of players who will fight each week for every point, and who will also
fight for each other. After three league
games this season, we looked all over the place. But Arsene has bought wisely
(well, apart from Park) and knitted a great bunch of players together. Similar,
Ferguson has spent less than Mancini, but has built a better team. Mancini
can’t seem to motivate his players, and some of his tactical decision making
has been baffling.
For us, the only question now is can we
build on this result and entrench ourselves in third place. It’s highly
annoying that Chelsea benefitted from ridiculous decisions yesterday, because
otherwise we would be cruising towards the Champions League. As it is, we’re
still only five points clear of fifth place, and we have some tough fixtures
coming up. I think the team now has momentum, and we should now be the
favourites for third, let alone fourth, even with our/spurs/chelsea’s fixtures.
But there’s a long way to go, and we cannot get complacent. The team and
manager have done so much to restore the relationship between them and the fans
since September – let’s not blow it now.
3 comments:
The neighbours are getting super giddy about probably winning their 20th title. Good luck to them, whoever finishes top of a 38 match league will have faced the same problems as everyone else and deserves it. I wonder though if this party is a little special for them as they have beaten us? Likkle City, the footballing lottery millionaires. Possibly, probably, although i couldn´t give a monkeys. Let them enjoy it, it could be their last for a long while.
Why am i positive? Pretty easy really, i don´t look at single match or a 5 match sample as a cue for a player´s or manager´s strength, i tend to look at the bigger picture. You can ususally appreciate the picture better that way.
We were told that City would be undergoing a 10 year plan in which, by the end we would not only be a major force, but world players. The marks were set increasingly higher, so that by the end of the fourth year, we should have won a trophy in the CL and challenging for the league. Well, for me that is a tick on the list. So the plan is on track.
So why would some blues be disappointed then? Well some of the giddy kippers have decided that success and improvement are linear and constant. The phrase two steps forward and one step back would not apply. The last couple of months have been disappointing, no doubt about that. We all want City to do well, but for some patience and anger take over and a small regessive step is seen as a disaster. Perspective goes out of the window and the ability to see and think clearly go out of the other window. Fortunately we don´t have fans on the board, otherwise this morning would probably see a series of embarrassing and irrational demands made.
What I see is a club that has pushed United all the way in the chase for the title, they haven´t won it yet either. Mathematics haven´t kicked in, so its on. The points haul this year has been terrific, we are equal now with the entire haul of last year and we were made up with that, so again this year sees an improvement. Looking at the last few seasons we have done as well as anyone with our points at this stage of the season, so that reassures me that we are making good progress.
It was rather strange seeing so many high crosses put in by Arsenal, against Kompany and Lescott it seems rather pointless. Still RVP was unlucky not to score when his header hit Vermaelen.
Quite a few incidents this weekend indicate to me that it would be far better to have video reviews that can provide a corrected judgement in most games rather than waste effort on goal line technology that will hardly ever be used.
SANTOS v GIBBS.
There is something very endearing about Santos: he plays freely and with plenty of skill, always has a smile on his face, and has a lovely left foot. (Just thought: you could apply all those to Vela, couldn't you?).
Gibbs plays in an identical way to Cole and Clichy: auxiliary winger, very quick, good up and down, and looks like a long-term Arsenal player. The other two learned from a senior partner while injuries have denied Gibbs that opportunity and his developmental needs are more exposed.
Gibbs is my preference.
KB
Post a Comment